New GFE, Hud-1, & closing procedures around the corner

RESPA reform has been in the works for sometime now.  I sat through an excellent continuing education class last week put on by the one and only Ken Perry of Broker Knowledge Group.

In the class he briefed us on the proposed changes to the good faith estimate (GFE), HUD-1 final settlement statement (click link to see example), and closing script procedures (click link to see example) that are likely to become a final rule sometime next week.  According to Ken the new rule will take effect next year.  Participants will have 12 months to transition their business to be in compliance.

These are BIG changes and I plan to put together a class for real estate professionals on the subject.  Here are some notes I took regarding the new GFE (click this link to view a copy of the new GFE).  You’ll find that most of these are criticisms:

*No where on the GFE does it show total payments including principal, interest, real estate taxes, & home insurance.

*On page 1 there is a box to check whether or not the loan has an escrow feature for real estate taxes or home insurance BUT it DOES NOT have a space to indicate the amount of the monthly escrow collection.

*HUD is essentially making yield spread premium pricing more transparent.  On page 2 section A, mortgage brokers will now have to charge the borrower their origination fee AND yield spread premium pricing and explain to them that the lender will credit them the yield spread premium.

*On page 2 section B HUD gives the lender room to itemize only 3 charges in the #3 & #5 sections (these sections are used to disclose estimated costs of third party providers).  The problem with this is that typically there are more than three charges to disclose.

*At the bottom of page 3 the lender will need to provide each borrower two options beside the main option which is being disclosed.  The first option will need to show a loan with lower costs but a higher interest rate.  The second option will need to show a lower interest rate but higher costs.

*At the top of the fourth page the lender is to disclose the ANNUAL costs of the borrower’s real estate taxes and homeowner’s insurance (as well as HOA/ flood insurance if applicable).  None of my clients are ever that concerned about the annual cost.  They tend to be more anxious to know the monthly cost.

*Lastly (but not leastly), NO WHERE ON THE NEW GFE IS THERE SPACE FOR US TO ESTIMATE OUR CLIENTS TOTAL CASH COMMITMENT AT CLOSING.  ARE YOU KIDDING ME?  THIS IS A HUGE OVERSIGHT ON THE PART OF HUD!

Twitter in the WSJ

I have been a user of twiiter.com for almost a year now.  I think it’s a great way to stay in touch with family in friends.

However, this morning’s story in the WSJ.com about the professional applications of twiiter.com got me thinking of ways that I could apply twitter.com to business.

Any ideas would be appreciated.  You may email them to me @ evan@mortgage-trust.com or comment below.

Also, in case you use twitter please feel free to follow me.  My “twitname” is ‘evanswanson’.

Explanation: Mortgage-backed securities (AKA MBS’s)

I came across this blog yesterday and started sifting through the postings.  This site does an excellent job of providing educational postings covering various topics in the mortgage industry.

Specifically, I really liked this posting which explains the factors that contributed to the development of the mortgage-backed bond market.  I also blogged about this topic around the time when speculation over the insolvency of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was hitting the news.

Essentially, mortgage-backed bonds were originally developed to “spread risk” among many financial institutions back when the banking industry was made up of many regional banks.  The need to spread risk was needed because regional banks were too leveraged to the local economy they did business in.

However, over the years the development of the mortgage-backed bond market (AKA “securitization”) has encouraged bankers to place emphasis on loan volume instead of loan quality.  Thus, we find ourselves in the mess we’re in today.

Fiscal literacy

I am happy to see that one of my industry’s trade publications is touting the importance of fiscal literacy in our profession.  Maria Valentin wrote an article entitled, “Fiscal Literacy- The First Steps to Responsible Lending” in which she called for increased financial education on the part of mortgage professionals.  This is a core piece of my business philosophy and one that I believe is paramount to the future health of our economy.

FHA follows suit on tightening underwriting guidelines

A few weeks ago I blogged about tighter underwriting guidelines pertaining to conventional loans for home-buyers who are seeking to close on a new home prior to selling their existing home.

Today we got notification from HUD indicating that FHA loans would also adopt similar guidelines (click this link to view the announcement for yourself).

Essentially, the new guidelines make it harder for home-buyers who have yet to sell their existing home to take out a new mortgage to buy a new home.

What does this mean for home-buyers?

It means that home-buyers who want to buy a new home without selling their existing home either must show enough income to reasonably afford both mortgage payments or plan on selling their existing home before or concurrently with their existing home.

Are there any exceptions?

Yes, if a home-buyer is being relocated for their job and can provide a legitimate rental contract they may use rental income to offset the mortgage payment on the existing home.

Or, if the home that is being vacated has a loan that is no more than 75% of the value of that home then the home-buyer may also use a legitimate source of rental income.

Relationship-based business is my focus

I came across this article in the Huffington Post today and the message resonated with me.

Although the article is directed towards the advertising & media industry the underlying message is fundamental to all businesses.

The author describes what I see as a dichotomy in many industries today.  At one extreme is a push towards “efficiency”, automation, and a “one-size fits all mentality”.

At the other end is a push towards customized solutions, relationships, and individual focus.

If you know anything about my business philosophy then you know that I lean towards the latter.  I am most interested in getting to know my clients needs and educating my clients on how to customize their mortgage so that it fits their financial objectives and philosophy.

Unfortunately I see too many homebuyers and homeowners opt for the former by working with so called “low-cost” mortgage providers who promise to provide loans with the “lowest rates and fees”.  I am reminded of a quote from one financial guru who said, “sometimes the loan with the lowest rate is not the loan which will bring your clients greater wealth over time.”

I am left thinking of ways that I can deepen my relationships with my clients, better educate them to make sound decisions, and be an adviser for them over time.

Any suggestions for me?  Please comment below…..

In real estate downturn demand grows for Green building

The Economist had a great article in their Technology Quarterly section of the latest issue which talked about green homes.  Much of article talks about some of the technological innovations which are occurring specifically with windows. If you’d like to read the article yourself you may download by clicking here.

Especially in the Pacific NW I have to believe that more and more consumers will concern themselves with green principles.

If you have any other thoughts or resources that you can share regarding this subject I’d love it if you could comment on them below.

Fannie Mae continues to tighten qualifying standards

This morning Fannie Mae released updated guideline changes for conforming mortgages.  This is a sign that we can continue to expect tightening in the area of loan approval guidelines which will make it more difficult for borrowers to qualify for loans in the future. I don’t think these changes will drastically impact most real estate & mortgage professionals core business but for those who tend work with investors and borrwers with less than favorable credit this is not good news.

Here is a summary of the most important changes in my opinion:

-Loan-to-value restrictions for cash-out: Fannie Mae is limiting cash-out refinances on owner-occupied homes to 85% (currently is 90%, FHA still allows borrowers to go to 95%).

-Loan-to-value restrictions for purchase and refinance of investment property: Fannie Mae is restricting maximum financing for purchase of an investment property to 75% (currently 90%).

-Investment property interest rates to increase: Fannie Mae is increasing the margin on investment property loans compared to owner-occupied interest rates.  The margin gets increasingly larger with the loan-to-value but currently investment property purchases carry a rate that is approximately .375%-.625% higher and it looks like the new margins will be closer to .75%-1.50%.

-Maximum number of properties financed: Currently Fannie Mae will allow a borrower to own only 10 financed properties if they want to take out a new mortgage to buy a 2nd home or investment property.  Moving forward this will be restricted to 4.  If the borrower is buying a primary residence then this guideline doesn’t apply although many banks have overriding guidelines that supersede this change.

-Higher minimum credit scores: In the announcement Fannie Mae also said they would be raising the minimum credit scores required to qualify for various loan scenarios.  There are too many to go into detail here but the bottom line is borrowers will have to have better credit in order to qualify for higher loan-to-value loans, investment property loans, & 2nd home loans than before.

Click this link to review the entire announcement.  The timing in which these changes will take affect have yet to be determined but we know it will be no later than December 1, 2008 and probably even sooner depending on the lender.

4 Pillars of Cash-Flow Management

The following model is the basis for successful long-term financial management.  In our view, the following four pillars represent, in order of importance, the key to incorporating financial responsibility into a person’s life.  It is our goal to introduce and educate our clients on how the decisions they make surrounding the house that they buy and the mortgage they select will ultimately affect their financial well-being.

 

Pillar 1: Creating a cushion

 

The first pillar in the 4 pillar system involves creating a financial cushion. It is important to have money on hand that is readily accessible for life’s little (or large) unbudgeted emergencies.  The purpose of this account is to allow a person to pay for these emergencies with cash instead of falling into the all too common habit of using credit.

 

In calculating how much a person needs to satisfy this first pillar we recommend that a person first estimate their “survival number”.  Their survival number is the amount that they spend each month on essential items in their budget such as housing payments, food, utilities, and minimum payments on credit obligations.  This amount would allow them to “get by” without spending money on discretionary items such as Starbucks, eating out, and other purchases which could be eliminated if need be.

 

Once this amount has been established a person can calculate how many months worth of survival reserves they’d like to have.  Most financial planners recommend that a salaried person have 3-5 months worth of survival reserves in a safe liquid savings account whereas a self-employed or commissioned earner keeps 5-7 months in reserve.

 

Pillar 2: Get Debt Free

 

Once a financial cushion has been established a person can now focus on the second pillar of cash management.  Reaching the second pillar involves eliminating all “non-preferred debt”.  Non-preferred debt is all debt which does not meet most, if not all, of the following criteria:

            carries a reasonable interest rate

            has tax benefits

            is secured by an asset which is appreciating

            has affordable payments

 

In general, non-preferred debt includes all debt that isn’t a mortgage (some exceptions apply).  That said, our focus is to develop a strategy that will help our client pay-off their non-preferred debt as quickly as possible. 

 

By eliminating these miscellaneous monthly obligations a person is able to free-up additional monthly cash-flow that can then be directed to savings & investment accounts.  The key to financial independence is for a person to have control of their money and then conserve it, instead of consuming it.

 

Pillar 3: Liquidity

 

True financial security comes with having liquid funds available at any time.  This next pillar is about having 1 year’s worth of a person’s income or more available to them for either good or bad reasons.

 

A good reason why a person may want this type of money available to them is to take advantage of a business or investment opportunity.  Most of the time when a person is presented with an investment opportunity a significant amount of capital is required upfront.  If a person has the money to be able to participate then they can do so, but most people are not in a financial position to take advantage of these opportunities when they come along.  

 

An example of a bad reason to use liquidity is in the case of a major interruption to a person’s income.  This may be due to an illness, sudden disability, job lay-off, or economic down-turn outside of a person’s control.  In this instance liquidity can help fulfill a gap of income and still maintain a comfortable life.  By the way, the number one cause of foreclosure in the United States is disability. 

 

Pillar 4: Pay-off your house

 

This is the point where it can really get exciting.  For most people, having their mortgage paid off is a far-off dream that may never come to fruition.  But, by focusing on strategies to effectively achieve the first three pillars of this system it can become a very realistic target. 

 

Most people define “having their mortgage paid off” as not having a mortgage on their house.  But, wouldn’t it also be true if a person had a $300,000 mortgage secured against their home and also had $300,000 in liquid assets?  After all, their personal balance sheet would show a $300,000 liability on one side and a $300,000 asset on the other. 

 

This topic raises some very interesting questions and opens up some powerful opportunities.  But, if a person has not yet addressed pillars 1 through 3 then does it even make sense to focus on down payments, principal payments, and home equity?  The bottom line is that an effective financial plan and strategy will do more for a person’s long-term financial well-being than most anything else. 

 

Would you like to share this model with others?  You may download this documents by clicking this link-evans-4-pillars-cash-flow-management-model-mti.

 

As always, I invite you to share comments below!

Professional Partner quoted in Portland Business Journal!

I was excited when I picked up this week’s edition of the Portland Business Journal last night and saw Kate Myer’s picture on the front cover.  Kate was quoted in the story (click this link to download complete story-subprime-problems-loom-pdxbiz-kmyers2) not only because she recently purchased a home but also for her professional opinion on the impact that upcoming foreclosures will have on the local housing market.  Nice job Kate!